My brother Joe and I went to the Riverside for the annual April Ghouls portion of the Drive-in Monster-rama. As was typical we went out the Thursday before and left the Sunday after.
The trip this year was not as exciting as in past years Joe’s work took a front seat to a lot of the trip, things were melting down and he had to be on call.
Thursday night I cranked out a quick piece on the Riverside’s drive to crowd fund some repairs to keep things going. They want to get AC in the snack bar fixed as well as the drainage in the parking are and modifications to the ticket booth (
Information here)Friday was a rain event and all of our plans that were outside were canceled. We ended up mostly tracking down Pokemon cards for my niece.
Our time at the drive in was fun. The rain largely stayed away in the hours before the film so we got to talk to Mike and Jake and several other people whose name I didn't catch. I was going to try and grab Gene for an impromptu interview but things were a bit hectic since George wasn’t there.
 |
Photo lifted from the Drive in Monsterama Facebook page |
Not long before the group photo the rain started and it got worse as the evening went on. By the time the first of four Nightmare on Elm Street films started it was tough to watch the films.
 |
A clear moment in the rain |
Because it was raining I really couldn't watch NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET as a film with a story. Instead I was watching it as a kind of an object. I looked at it not as part of a series or something new, but as a stand alone film for the first time since it was released.
Honestly I don't think it holds up. Actually I'm kind of at a loss as to why it clickedwith audiences. What is it about Fred Kruger (as he is billed in the credits) that clicked. He is basically a non-entity for almost the whole film. He is not the quip machine he would become. He is just a figure. The film is firmly Nancy's film, and she is really badly written (and badly performed). Even allowing that this is supposed to have dream logic, the film makes no sense. Sure Johnny Depp came from this but he too has no character. Yes, he has a great death scene but otherwise he's a void. (That he would be an Oscar nominee later in his career is not evident) The set pieces are nothing special. Outside of the ending I realized I remembered almost nothing of this film.
Watching it for the first time in a long time I realize it's one of Wes Craven's least films. It feels like what I think it is, a workman like film from Craven. It's very by the numbers. It feels like a 1970's drive in horror film, both in a good way and a bad way. I'm not knocking Craven, I think he is a great director, but he was best he could step away from the grindhouse and do more - look at the films he did around it. Sure this made money- but I like pretty much every other film he did better. This film was throw back to where he started- not what he had been doing with DEADLY BLESSING or SWAMP THING or would do after it. This is actually atypical in that this is the on film from Craven where you can actually see the construction from off the shelf pieces. Its his least organic film.
I was shocked and disappointed that it wasn't better.
Thinking about the film during the screening I realized that I never much cared for the series. Yes the films have some great pieces but at the same time the plots are crappy everything exists just to get to the kills and the quips. This is a flaw in so many horror film series. Here the problem is Fred is intially out for revenge and has weird rules that never show up again (you have to look at him for him to have power.). It's like in the FRIDAY THE 13TH films where Jason only shows up at the very end and is a thin, malnurished kid...only to be a hulking guy in the remainer of the series.
I was kind of heartbroken.
With the rain getting heavy and making watching the films a chore Joe and I left early.